After oxygen and water, food is what keeps us living and healthy however, some types of foods are better than others with the best type being “true food”.
But which are the true foods?
True foods are those that grow in NATURE, minimally processed (transformed/preserved in a traditional or innovative way; fewer additives, better and much better if all of them are natural), SUSTAINABLE (produced in healthy soil using clean water, respecting the environment and biodiversity) AND ETHICALLY PRODUCED (towards humans, animals and all living beings involved).
This definition points out two fundamental concepts: NATURE and SUSTAINABILITY that includes ethical production.
What is nature?
Nature is all living and inanimate beings that make up the earth and that interact with each other in a balance where matter and energy circulate. Nature follows its own order and is governed by constant laws that human beings can know but cannot modify.
Many humans (Homo sapiens) think that we are superior to all living beings, despite being one of the youngest species on earth and not knowing if we will ever live as long as bacteria or plants. We are also a very small part of life on Earth.
A study published in 2018 that quantifies life on Earth in terms of carbon (C), a common element of all living beings, shows that plants are the most abundant living forms representing 82.5%. Then we find the tiny bacteria that represents 14.2% of the life on Earth and after the fungi representing 2.2%. Bacteria and fungi are everywhere including IN and ON us influencing our health (see post on the Microbiome). Then there are the algae that represent 0.7% and finally the animals, the group to which we belong which represents 0.4% of life on earth.1
it means that human beings cannot live: more than 4 minutes without breathing proper air, more than 4 days without proper water, more than 42 days without nourishment and for all this to be possible the Earth must be covered with at least 60% of Forest, of green, including the plankton that lives in water of the oceans, seas, rivers, lakes, etc. This is the only way to maintain a proper atmospheric dynamic that allows human life or 78.1% nitrogen (N2), 20.9% oxygen (O2), 0.9% argon (Ar) and very little other gases including carbon dioxide (CO2, 0.04%).
The oxygen (O2) from the air that we need to live is produced by green beings thanks to a substance called chlorophyll. Chlorophyll reacts with CO2 in the presence of sunlight. These green beings are plants as well as bacteria and algae that feed on dead matter previously transformed by fungi, bacteria or animals such as worms. Respiration produces CO2 which is essential in the production of oxygen and sugars. Part of these sugars are stored in roots that feed bacteria and fungi from soil. Some fungi associate with the roots of plants forming mycorrhiza (myco=fungus and rhiza=root), a beneficial symbiosis for both organisms. Together they can travel big distances to get water and nutrients they need to live. Mycorrhizae connect with each other and at the same time interact with bacteria and some animals forming a very efficient communication and exchange system known as “Wood Wide Web”.
There is a complex and perfect balance between life and death and life and life. The community we are part of is fascinating!
The Amisacho collective in the Ecuadorian Amazon is producing short videos. The concepts transmitted allow a clear understanding of how the Amazon rainforest works, the cycles of nature, how they influence the planet’s climate and individual and collective solutions to live in a respectful way.
If we zoom in on the group of animals, we will note that the largest segment is represented by fish (30%) and that all together arthropods, mollusks, nematodes, annelids and cnidarians represent 63.6% of all animals. Humans represent 2.5% of animals while birds and wild mammals together represent only 0.4% and cattle 4.2%.1 This means that in terms of carbon (C) there are 5 times more humane than all wild birds and mammals combined, and nearly twice as many livestock as humans.
It is evident that we have NOT been paying attention to our environment and that our activities are impacting biodiversity.
Sustainability concerns us and our activities and deals with three elements: the environment, society and the economy. Of these 3, the economy is not part of nature, however, the narrative about the importance of money that first appeared about 5,000 years ago with the appearance of the first coins is so strong that today we cannot perceive the economy outside of the human context.
All human economic activity depends on nature. It is estimated that globally, nature provides services worth approximately US 125 trillion annually.2
The human activity dedicated to food production is agriculture that first appeared about 12,000 years ago. Agriculture deals with domestication of plants and animals.
Farmers have domesticated some living beings learning from them and from nature, observing and experimenting, a very interesting and important job that has allowed the development of humanity. After the Second World War, the green revolution began in which agriculture was industrialized. This industrialization or dehumanization together with large-scale global trade has contributed to the current social, environmental and economic imbalances.
Agriculture is against nature but it can be respectful if it respects nature as is done by agroecological and regenerative farmers around the world.
Today there are many problems related with food: overweight and malnutrition, waste, environment destruction and loss of biodiversity. Even though small farmers who produce in an area below 2 hectares of the worlds food and protect food diversity, many of them live in extreme poverty. Let’s do what we can to help these farmers be successful and in turn, we will all prosper!
What can we do?
First of all, let’s inform ourselves because knowledge is essential.
Let’s be smart consumers and remember that our demand and our everyday actions can generate positive changes. Let’s buy local, seasonal, socially and environmentally responsible products and let’s support farmers who work respecting nature locally and globally.
Let’s practice urban agriculture respecting nature and learning from nature, thus building resilient, green, inclusive and sustainable cities. One pot at a time – remembering that to be a respectful farmer we must learn many things and be open to new ideas.
Let’s cook more often using local, seasonal, socially and environmentally responsible products to know, taste and experience new flavors. Let’s not be afraid to use unusual vegetables, “ugly” produce that may not be the perfect specimen of what we are used to seeing in the grocery store, try wild products that we are not use to eating and become aware of the importance of dietary diversity. Let’s not forget that cooking is an act of love towards ourselves and the people for whom we cook!
I highly recommend the Radio Semilla podcast (only available in Spanish) of the Red de Guardianes de Semillas who, with a relaxed vibe and broad vision, speak of social, environmental and economic regeneration with local solutions. With a different approach, the podcast Food Talks (only available in English), is also worth a listen. Both are fantastic, informative and fun!
To improve the food system, changes are needed from the production to the table, from those who grow food to those who eat it, and all those who move the food in between! Remember that food is directly connected with the farmers, the land, the watersheds and the climate; and that our health is a reflection of the quality and quantity of the food we consume. In the end, it is all – and we are all – interconnected! Let’s take care of one another!
A curious man enters one of the orchards of the Segantini Park and finds Sergio and Luca. He’s Junior, a young man who is passionate about the land and eager to know how we grow plants in the park, and why? He also works the land there and, because of the pandemic, he has been trying to do it for a living since last year. He tells us that he has not studied agriculture, that he learned the basics in his native Cuba where all the children and young people cultivate the land after school, “I work hard for a child,” he tells us.
Sergio and Luca show Junior our worm compost that has been working for the past two years. Depending on the time of year, the compost is made in a period between 3 and 6 months. Junior tells us that it could be more efficient and, if we want, he can show us how to do it. Salomé, who is very interested in home composting, gets involved and immediately organizes a visit to Gaggiano where Junior works.
To Gaggiano by bike to make earth
It was a Sunday with good weather at the beginning of May when 5 people, Francesca, Nicolò, Enrico, Ivana and Salomé, arrived by bike at the garden center where Junior works.
We met Junior, who welcomed us with enthusiasm and immediately showed us how the orchard/plant garden works. In the orchard, Junior grows a wide variety of vegetables that are disappearing. Due to globalization, food diversity is in danger. Fortunately, there are people like Junior working to recover it.
His way of cultivating not only has a practical approach, a synergistic garden in full respect for nature and relationships with various organisms, but it is also a philosophy of life! His garden highlights the importance of mother earth as well as a non-consumeristic lifestyle that values relationships.
Junior told us that when he arrived in Lombardy, he wondered what he could offer that land and that particular place. He saw that in the vicinity there were rice fields and a rice factory that produced the bran of the grains as a waste product. As he later pointed out, bran is an important ingredient in his compost. Also nearby, Junior has access to cows from which he takes manure as well as pieces of wood from the trees that border the vivarium, both of which are the ideal substrates for decomposing microorganisms.
Another way to compost
Let’s get to work, first we collect all the ingredients we would need:
molasses (water saturated with sugar, about half a liter)
freshly cut grass
pieces of bark with microorganisms (branches with bark)*
* The microorganisms can be found at the base of large trees, just below the first layer of soil. They are like thin white cobwebs. In the absence of these, you can find pre-packed, ready-to-use microorganisms for purchase. In Italy, for example, there is a product called Top Crop from Microvita.
When we went to collect the ingredients, we observed the land around the garden center. Many rice fields were not yet productive but instead were dry land waiting to be fertilized and irrigated.
We start by making a small fire that will be completely covered with the rice bran and will slowly burn until it becomes active black carbon (charcoal), rich in minerals. The bran burns slowly and, little by little, we add more bran that strangely does not produce a flame, but instead, a delicious smell.
He explains that the combustion process (the burning) helps to release minerals. As a result of the combustion process, charcoal is formed. (Charcoal can can also be purchased). Any straw that decomposes easily and does not need to be burned could also be used in place of charcoal.
Meanwhile, on the ground, we draw a circle of 1 meter in diameter. Junior explained that a good compost should be as high as the circumference of its base (1 meter).
While we waited for the rice bran to burn, we went to eat a delicious barbecue with friends.
When we return, we proceed to arrange the layers to create the compost pile:
We start with the straw, then the shredded grass, then the pieces of bark with microorganisms, a little cow manure (NB: for a compost in the city, raw leftovers found in the kitchen can also be used (just remember not to use meat products as this may attract rats and/or other rodents) and a good stream of water.
The proportion of ingredients is 3 (parts of dry matter: straw and bark pieces) to 1 (part of wet matter: grass, manure). The dry matter adds carbon (C) while the wet adds nitrogen (N).
One could also add a little finished compost (as is done in the Segantini park) as an inoculator (due to the presence of worms).
We add straw again, then grass, microorganisms from the envelope (commercially available), molasses, pieces of branches, grass and then water.
The sequence should be as follows: dry, wet, dry, wet … and in between the microorganisms and water. With all this good “food” for the soil, Junior tells us that earthworms will come too.
We continue like this until the pile reaches one meter in height.
At that point, we return to our rice bran, which has meanwhile been turned into charcoal. We extinguish the fire using a lot of cold water and spread the finished charcoal on top of the compost pile. The wet rice bran will regulate the moisture and release the minerals.
The pile is covered with a black plastic to increase the rate of the decomposition process (it helps to keep it warm and humid). The compost pile will reach a very high temperature of up to 70 degrees Celsius(158 degrees Fahrenheit) during the first few days! This allows pathogens to be eliminated.
After about 5 days, Junior will turn the compost with a pitchfork, reconstituting the pile, a process that introduces air (most importantly oxygen) and will cover it again. The compost pile will be turned the same way a total of 5 times (about every 5 days).
Compost transformation will occur in approximately 1 month. If left uncovered, it would take much longer.
When the compost is ready it will be reduced by about half its initial size.
Coincidentally, that Sunday was May 9, Mother’s Day. Junior makes us notice that together we celebrate our “pacha mama” (mother earth) by making her a cake.
We bike back home, happy with a new perspective on compost, microorganisms, rice waste, and respect for the earth.
It’s a Monday in late March, it’s warm. In the Segantini Park, among the trees within the naturalist area, green with the first shoots of spring, a group of volunteers closely follows Luciano Mazzola who has brought four beehives.
Two families will produce honey, and the other two will also serve to monitor air quality, which will be carried out thanks to the collaboration with researchers from the Catholic University of Piacenza.
The Project is call BeeResponsible and is financed by Dyson, a company that has found a smart way of doing corporate social activity.
A small group of interested people will follow a course with Luciano and will accompany him during the care visits to the hives. If everything goes well, at the end of this experimentation year, the hives will stay at the Segantini park. Here, it will be possible to taste the honey from the flowers of the park and also from the balconies of the Milanese people.
Bees feed on flowers within a radius of 3 km, so anyone with a flower on their balcony can help feed these fascinating creatures that, in addition to producing honey, pollinate plants better than any other insect.
Once the hives have been moved, the group moves under the pergola of one of the vegetable gardens within the park to listen to the first of a series of lessons on the life of bees and the management of a hive. The age of the people in the audience is diverse. There is even a child who ask his mother whenever he does not understand. He feels that something important is being talked about.
Did you know, for example, that in 2018 Europe banned neonicotinoids pesticides widely used in agriculture that also kill bees? Therefore, we hope to see more beehives in the Po Valley.
Luciano explains that during their evolutionary path, bees have learned to communicate to their mates the location of the flowers thanks to a “dance” in which they explain the direction and distance of the feast. Bees are orientated with the position of the sun. You can find many videos on YouTube that explain and interpret this “dance”.
We also discovered that, in their two months of life, the bees carry out a rotation of the work of the hive: in the first weeks, they perform domestic tasks of cleaning and caring for the eggs, then the guard of the door, and finally, when they are mature and well trained to smells, they go out to look for nectar from flower to flower.
The queen, on the other hand, lives up to five years and, after the nuptial flight in which she is impregnated by a dozen drones (who die after the act), she lays eggs throughout her life.
People that have sweet tooth for honey will be interested to know that some jars sold at very low prices may contain something other than honey. In fact, for honey to be considered as such, must be produced by bees that pass the nectar from mouth to mouth in a practice called trophallaxis that enriches the nectar with enzymes that also allow bees that do not leave the hive to feed.
Other fan bees will help reduce the moisture of the nectar below 18% to turn it into honey, a food that can be stored for a long time.
In other parts of the world, it is allowed to collect nectar from hives and transform it into honey in factories with the addition of sugar, which for obvious reasons produces a much less nutritious and balanced food.
The subspecies raised in Italy is called the ligusticabee and is known around the world for being gentle and non-aggressive, so don’t be afraid of them.
Before leaving us, Luciano recommended a book: “The Buzz about Bees” by Jürgen Tautz that combines a practical approach with a more philosophical one accompanied by beautiful photos.
The meeting is over. It is sunset and we leave with a feeling of harmony and interconnection between us, the bees and the flowers. Tonight at home we will look at the flower on the balcony with new eyes. We will know that we are involved in the world of bees and that we collaborate with them in the dissemination of plants and the health of the planet.
This is the first of a series of posts where we will talk about bees, stay tuned!
As we saw in post 2, to produce food, natural resources (air, water, soil, biodiversity) and energy are needed. Food production is just one of the many human activities that have an impact on the planet’s limited resources.
Regarding food, are we consuming more that the earth produces? Is there enough food to feed everyone?
Today we produce food to feed10 billion people1 for a planet which is currently home to around 7.7 billion.2 No wonder every year we waste ca. 1/3 of the food produced (post 3)) and 1.9 billion people are overweight!3. And still, there are 821 million undernourished people!4
To understand why this happens, it is important to learn about two concepts which are key for sustainability: Biocapacity and Ecological Footprint.
Earths Biocapacity is a quantitative way of measuring the natural resources that the earth produces each year (in global hectares or gha) to allow human life (clean water and air, biodiversity, healthy soils, shelter and medicines).5,6,7
It refers to the amount of productive area that is available to generate natural resources and to absorb the waste (ecosystem services).5-7.
The calculated Biocapacity for year 2007 was 1.8 gha.5-7
The Human Ecological Footprint is a quantitative way of measuring the demand that human activity puts on nature. It refers to the consumption of productive land (resources in gha) of each person (biologically productive land and water area required to produce all the resources an individual, population, or activity consumes, and to absorb the waste they generate).5-7
The calculated world average Ecological Footprint for year 2007 was 2.7 gha.5-7
At the individual level, the Ecological Footprint refers to: the food we eat (energy, land, water, biodiversity), the water we use and the energy we consume (at home, to move around, to work, to live!).
Biocapacity, Ecological Footprint and Population
From the numbers above, it becomes evident that in 2007, our global consumption (Ecological Footprint: 2.7 gha) is much higher than the earth’s capacity to recover (Biocapacity: 1.8 gha).
To live sustainably, our Ecological Footprint (that of all humanity) should never exceed the Biocapacity of the earth.
The figure below shows the Ecological footprint and Biocapacity from 1960 to 2010 and the population growth up until 2019.
In 2007, humanity used resources equivalent to one and a half planets. If the trend continues, by 2050, 2 planets will be needed.5-7
Humanity is already using more resources than the earth can regenerate. This is known as overshoot, and each year this occurs, the biological debt increases with extreme consequences such as the loss of diversity (biological and cultural), migration and climate change. And the population keeps growing…
Are we all using resources in the same way?
Well, the Biocapacity and the Ecological Footprint are not the same for all people in all nations. The Global Footprint Network provides online data clearly showing the situation of all countries in the world. Let’s take, as an example, the year 2016. In 2016, the Biocapacity and Ecological Footprint in the United States were 3.6 and 8.1 gha (-4.5, deficit), in Italy 0.9 and 4.4 gha (-3.5, deficit), in China 1.0 and 3.6 gha (-2.6, deficit), in Brazil 8.7 and 2.8 gha (+5.9, reserve), and in Gabon 22.1 and 2.3 gha (+19.8, reserve).
This means that from these 5 countries, only Gabon and Brazil would have natural reserves to consume what they do and more. However, in a global scale, Gabon and Brazil are unwillingly using their resources to maintain the lifestyles of overconsumption of USA, Italy and China.
In 2007, the 5 countries with the highest Ecological Footprint were: United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Denmark, Belgium and United States, while the countries with the highest Biocapacity were: Gabon, Bolivia, Mongolia, Canada and Australia.7
Learn more about the global situation and find out about the situation in your own country using the interactive online platform of the Global Footprint Network. It’s really worth checking out!
With all this information, it seems that Ecological Footprint is related to human wellbeing, wouldn’t you agree?
Human Development and the Ecological Footprint:
Human Development can be ranked using the Human Development Index (HDI). The HDI is a number calculated based on life expectancy, education and per capita income of a person in a country.
The United Nation Development Program defines a high level of development with HDI scores of 0.8 or greater.7
Considering again the data from 2007, in an ideal economic, social and environmental planet, all countries should have a HDI equal or higher to 0.8 and an Environmental Footprint that would not exceed 1.8 gha (or the earths biocapacity).7
No country on earth meets both conditions.
Interestingly, low-income countries which have abundant natural resources (high Biocapacity) have too small Ecological Footprints to meet the basic needs of food, shelter, health and sanitation of their populations.
Humanity faces two big challenges:
for highly developed countries, to maintain peoples well-being reducing the demand on nature and
for developing nations, to guarantee the well-being of society without increasing Ecological Footprints.
Every person on the planet has the right to live better. However, the well-being of human societies depends of biological capital (Biocapacity) and therefore, human comforts (security, material needs, health, social relations, etc.). We must consider effective long-term resource management in order to address and reverse ecological degradation.7
To delve deeper into this topic, we recommend that you read our post that talks about Environmental Justice.
But, how can we explain that resources from low-income biologically-rich countries are being used to satisfy other countries’ demands? Is this land grabbing?
Land grabbing is a process (usually violent) in which fertile agricultural land is privatized, usually for food corporation and mining companies. The GRAIN organization alerts that this global land grab could represent the end of small-scale farming, and rural livelihoods, in many places around the world.8
Using the data of GRAIN, Baveye et al., have published a map of the worlds land grab in 2008 which shows that China, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and other countries own vast amounts of land abroad. For example, China in 2008 owned ca. 2 million hectares distributed in Philippines, Laos, Australia, Russia, Kazakhstan, Cameroon, Uganda and Tanzania.9
It would be useful to see what is going on today. To learn more about this argument, check out the publications from GRAIN. They are well worth a read!
If the land no longer belongs to the people living there, or even the country, what happens with the rights of those people and with their well-being? What happens with the land and the ecological services nature provides?
Human well-being and natural resource
Human well-being depends on biodiversity (species richness and rarity, biomass density, primary productivity and genetic diversity) and the services that a healthy ecosystem provides (food, water, fiber, medicine, energy, spiritual, ethic, climate regulation, energy and matter exchange, etc.). 7
All human economic activity depends on nature. It’s estimated that, globally, nature provides services worth around US$125 trillion a year.6
Unluckily, biological diversity is being lost. For example, the loss of animal diversity, measured using Living Planet Index between 1970 and 2014, shows that the overall species population of vertebrates has declined 60% (89% loss in South and Central America). The loss of fresh water species was 89%.6
For more information on endangered species, have a look the website of the IUCN Red List, which is a critical indicator of the health of the world’s biodiversity.
A healthy planet has enabled development of modern human society. Would it be possible to continue human development without healthy natural systems (biodiversity)?
The answer depends on us and on our capacity to change, adapt and create!
We are the first generation that has a clearer picture of the value of nature and the enormous impact we have on it.6
And why not begin with the understanding of our own personal situation!
Personal Ecological Footprint
The Ecological Footprint is different for every person. It is related to individual actions. Even within a nation, the Ecological Footprint is not the same for all.
People that buy food from abroad and travel a lot by car and plane have a higher Environmental Footprint than people consuming locally produce food, preferring moving by bike/public transport/walking and rarely flying.
There are online platforms that help to calculate our personal Ecological Footprint. However, we recommend that you search for a local platform within your city or country as they might include local parameters (energy, water, transportation and waste). Give it a try!!
Let’s calculate our personal Ecological Footprint together
We found a very interesting study from Legambiente, an environmental Italian association, analysing the ecological footprint of the city of Padua.10 This study provides a Table for a first calculation of the personal ecological footprint in a month in area (hectares, ha) from kilograms (Kg) of food consumed, kilowatts (KWh) of energy used at home and kilometres used in transport (Km).
We have reproduced the excel sheet from this study (download here). If you wish to help us, please download the sheet and send the completed version with your personal results via email (firstname.lastname@example.org) sharing with us your name and country from where you are sending it. If we reach a significant number, we will share the results in a post!
This global problem is not new. In 2015, 193 countries belonging the United Nations countries, together with 150 leaders around the world, have agreed upon 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) to be met by year 2030. These goals aim to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure prosperity for all.11
Sustainable Development Goals
As shown in the figure bellow, the 17 goals put at the base, the importance of protecting nature to build a healthy society that will support a fair economy.
If we work together to achieve these goals, things will start to improve. Let’s give it a try!!
Importantly, all of these goals can be achieved by improving the food system. Food can be a good starting point to make changes. We all eat and our food choices have a direct impact on economy, society and the environment.
To better understand the impact of food on sustainability, the Barilla Center for Food and Nutrition has created a Food Sustainability Index. Data from 67 countries regarding food loss and waste, sustainable agriculture and nutritional challenges were analyzed and scored. The top 3 performing countries having policies and showing best practices in 2018 were France, the Netherlands and Canada. It is possible to check out the results and the scores of the participating countries – maybe yours is on the list!
BBC Mundo has published a very interesting article regarding this topic which includes an online calculator showing the environmental impact of 34 common foods and beverages. They remark that the Ecological Footprint depends not only on the food, but also specifically how and where it was produced. This is really worth checking out!
Human well-being will not be possible without preserving nature (ecological resources and services) which sustain economy and life.
However, as natural resources become scarcer than money, prosperity will depend on resource accounts (biocapacity) as much as it depends on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and other financial values.
A new way of thinking and revaluing nature (healthy ecosystems) and the services they provide should be considered. It is amazing how many new business opportunities are being created valuing all resources of the ecosystem and being respectful with nature and with people.
And of course, now that you know all of these things, try to make an effort to more thoughtfully choose what you eat, how you move and how much energy and water you use. Our interest, creativity and willingness to make little changes can and will improve things. Let’s give it a try:)
Everybody likes to talk about sustainability, nowadays. But, what does it mean, sustainability?
In very broad terms, the sustainability discourse builds on the assumption that we live in a closed environment and that, due mainly to human activities, environmental “goods” – that are services (such as clean air/water and rich soil) and resources (such as food and biodiversity) that we get from the natural environment – are limited.
Because our existence depends upon such a closed environment and natural resources are being increasingly depleted, ensuring that the resources we need to live are not exhausted becomes crucial.
So, in simple words, sustainability means that there is enough for everyone to survive today and in the future.
But, how do we reach sustainability?
In fact, nowadays it has become dramatically evident that the ability of some to fulfill their needs “here and now” may undermine the ability of others to fulfill their needs “there and then”.
For this reason, it’s very important – and indeed a matter of justice – to balance access to contested resources equitably between competing appropriators, today and tomorrow.
So, what does sustainability have to do with justice?
As was mentioned above, conflicting interests over natural resources and, more broadly, environmental goods oppose present from future generations, rural from urban communities, developing from developed countries, least developed countries and more climate change vulnerable countries from larger developing economies.
There exist different notions of sustainability and they all intersect, among others, with distributive justice concerns.
For instance, rural communities have an interest in preserving soil quality and biodiversity for agricultural purposes which competes with urban communities’ conflicting interest in increasing the availability of biofuels. Some developed countries – most notably, the European Union countries – have recently grown concerns about carbon emissions’ impact on the climate and have subsequently committed to reduce emissions levels. On the contrary, developing countries affirm their “right to growth” by emitting as much as developed countries have done so far.
In this respect, environmental protection is very much related to the problem of access to environmental goods which are limited in number and highly exhaustible (considering, for instance, soil in the example above).
In this sense, environmental protection is also very much related to a distributive justice discourse, as one of the purposes of distributive justice is adjudicating competing claims by giving a fair share to everyone. Meaning that the way natural resources are distributed among people should be fair to everyone.
Sustainability is a matter of environmental justice.
From an inter-generational perspective (which looks at the relationship between current and future generations), justice considerations recommend that thecurrent human development does not deplete the Earth resources, such as water, nourishing food and clean air, to such an extent that future generations will not be able to satisfy their needs.
Some sustain though that it is hard to tell what the future generations’ needs will be.
Depending on what notion of sustainability we choose, it may be deemed fair that present generations commit themselves, not only to avoid depletion beyond a certain extent, but also to actively preserve the integrity of the natural environment as they have inherited it.
After all, all approaches to sustainability are to some extent concerned about the well-being of future generations.
However, as said, the answer to the question what specifically should be the posterity’s inheritance may vary a lot.
In the nineteen seventies, economists and shallow environmentalists sustained that future generations should (just) be ensured the means to satisfy their needs: hence they assume that technology will ensure that there will always be enough resources to meet human needs.
In the nineteen nineties, by contrast, ecological sustainability theorists argued that future generations will require well-functioning ecosystems and sufficient resources.
From an intra-generational perspective (which looks at the relationship between people from different social backgrounds, geographical regions and communities in the present generation), justice considerations aim at ensuring equal access to environmental resources such as safe food produce and equal protection from environmental damage for all in the present generation.
While inter-generational justice sets the content of the obligations of present generations towards the future, intra-generational justice aims at sharing the responsibilities for the fulfillment of such obligations among those who are more responsible than others for moral degradation.
But what does this all mean?
Inter- and intra-generational justice
Let me explain these concepts with some good examples of combined inter- and intra-generational…injustice.
Environmental justice prescribes that environmental wrongs, such as waste, water discharges or air emissions,are borne by the communities who determined them: polluter pays.
So, for instance, in Italy, waste law prescribes that urban waste which cannot be recycled is disposed of (e.g. landfilled)in the same region where it was produced. There are not such constraints when urban waste is being recovered in waste recycling facilities or in waste-to-energy incineration plants: however, because in southern Italy there is just one such incinerator, northern Italy citizens often blame their public administrations as they grant permits for the construction of new incinerators that are believed to burn waste that was largely produced in the south.
This is not just a NIMBY phenomenon (Not In My Back Yard): differential waste-related exposure is in fact seen as a form of environmental inequality.
Likewise, waste dumping across national boundaries, notably from the industrialized world to emerging economies, is perceived as an environmental inequality. As a matter of fact, in the past twenty years, industrialized countries’ pollution control regimes have become stricter, costs associated with compliance with environmental obligations have significantly increased and notably waste treatment services have subsequently become more expensive.
As a result, less developed countries have been sometimes targeted by some more developed countries as “dumping grounds”, although these countries do not often have the technologies required to treat and dispose of wastes in a safe manner.
Today the landfill of Agbogbloshie (Accra) in Ghana is one of the largest landfill sites in the world. Assuming that the type of waste it assembles originated in Ghana would be blind optimism.
However, the environmental wrongs produced by this landfill – such as methane emissions, groundwater contamination, landscape intrusion – are, and will be, unfairly borne by current and future Ghanaian communities living nearby.
In both examples, communities living near these waste treatment facilities bear the consequences of waste produced by someone else, today and for the years to come. This is unfair both under an inter- and intra-generational perspective.
Another interesting example embodying both perspectives is provided by the implementation of a principle known at the international level as “common but differentiated responsibilities” and introduced by the Kyoto Protocol. This principle imposes different climate change mitigation responsibilities upon developed, on one side, and developing countries, on the other side, on the assumption that, given their longer industrialization history, developed countries have contributed to climate change to a larger extend than developing countries.
However, some developing countries’ carbon emissions levels have significantly grown in the past ten years and the principle of “common but differentiated responsibilities” has subsequently started to shake, together with the Kyoto Protocol and the UNFCCC’s COP system (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Conference of the Parties).
I hope it is clear now that sustainability is a matter of environmental justice and different perceptions about what is fair and just for present and for future generations shape different notions of sustainability.
Access to environmental resources, such as water, genuine food and clean air, was not felt by these communities as being fairly distributed between people of different ethnicity, income and class.
It is worthwhile to recall in this regard that one of the first actions that the Black Panthers movement took was serving free breakfast to black children before they went to school in Kansas City in 1969. Meaning that food is an environmental resource that should be provided to all equally!
Nowadays, the Fridays for Future movement, the IPCC reports, some piece of environmental legislation introduced, for instance, by the European Union all show that environmental justice is slowly discarding the former social justice approach (which, to be honest, sometimes could be just perceived as “the peripheries’ NIMBY”), to pursue broader ecological priorities.
We acquired more information about the many different impacts of our activities on the environment. We acknowledged that environmental problems are fundamentally rooted in human activities.
All human activities, due notably to the current patterns of economic development and the way human populations produce, consume and organize to satisfy their needs, have an impact on nature.
Hence, it is fair and just to ensure the long-term integrity of the natural environmenttoday and tomorrow and, in order to do this, access to, and use of natural resources need to be equitably regulated.
In the next post, I will discuss some examples that help to exhibit this move from the social focus to the ecological focus in Lombardia (northern Italy) and Milan, the region and city where I live. Stay tuned!
As Hippocrates, the father of medicine, already stated ca. 460 BC, …”Let food be thy medicine and thy medicine your food”… ourhealth is directly related to the food we consume!
This raises up the question, what shall we eat to be healthy?
The WHO (World Health Organization of the United Nations) emphasizes the importance of eating fruits, vegetables and legumes, and to restrict consumption of free sugars, trans-fats and salt.1
Importantly, it points out that diets evolve over time, being influenced by social and economic aspects including cultural traditions, individual beliefs and preferences, food prices and environmental factors.1 Therefore, an ideal diet can only be established inside the local contexts, meaning that there is a huge diversity of diets.
In recent years, the awareness
regarding a sustainable way of eating has increased.
For FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)…”sustainable diets are diets with low environmental impact which contribute to food and nutrition security and to healthy life for present and future generations. Sustainable diets are protective and respectful of biodiversity and ecosystems, culturally acceptable, accessible, economically fair and affordable; nutritionally adequate, safe and healthy; while optimizing natural and human resources.”…2
So, sustainable diets are
healthy diets for which the economic, social and environmental aspects are
taken in consideration, right?
A nice way of looking at the relationship between the nutritional value of food and its environmental impact is the double food and environmental pyramid model developed by the Barilla Center of Food and Nutrition and adapted to the Italian Mediterranean diet. For example, animal products that have a high environmental impact (bottom of the environmental pyramid) are recommended to be consumed in low amounts (top of the food pyramid) and fruits and vegetables that have a low environmental impact (top of the environmental pyramid) are recommended to be consume in high amounts (bottom of the food pyramid).
Of course, all of this has to considered
within the local context. If you live in north Canada as Inuit do, you might
not be able to eat lots of fresh fruits and vegetables and you probably get
high quantities of animal products, and that is ok! In fact, for centuries, we
all have adapted to our local conditions by eating mostly local food.
And very importantly, we shall
not all eat the same to be healthy. For example, indigenous people inside the
amazon don’t need wheat as a source of carbohydrates as they have manioc, they don’t
need olive oil as they have other sources of healthy fats (e.g. sacha ichi, Brazilian
nut, macambo), they don’t need salmon as they have paiche. Wouldn’t you agree?
And we are not saying we should eat strictly local food but, if we prefer it on regular basis, we support the local economy, preserve local traditions and protect local environments.
A very interesting article presented in the National Geographic magazine shows the evolution of diets and how similar or diverse these are in different countries. Really worth seeing.
According to FAO, diets that are
healthy and sustainable have the following characteristics:2
diverse (a wide variety of food)
balance between energy intake and
energy needs (or eat what the body needs)
based on minimally processesed tubers
and whole grains; legumes; fruits and vegetables – particularly those “robust”
(or less prone to spoilage) and those which require less of rapid and more
energy-intensive transport. Meat, if eaten, in moderate quantities – and all
animal parts consumed
eat in moderation: dairy products
or alternatives (e.g. fortified milk substitutes and other food rich in calcium
unsalted seeds and nuts
small quantities of fishand aquatic products sourced from
very limited consumption of food high in fat, sugar or salt and low in micronutrients (e.g. crisps,
confectionery, sugary drinks)
oils and fats with a beneficial
omega 3-6 ratio such as rapeseed, olive oil, avocado oil (and others)
tap water in preference to
In fact, these characteristics can be adapted to all
diets, don’t you think?
But let’s wait a second, before industrialization and globalization,
weren’t these characteristics followed by most cultures? It might be wise to look back and retake some food habits practiced by
A practical example of a healthy and sustainable dish
has recently been presented in the study of the EAT-Lancet Commission.3 Worth seeing!
Why is diversity so important?
The diversity of diets is not only key for protecting the
loss of biodiversity (i.e. genetic, species and ecosystem diversity4) and environment degradation but to preserve human food cultural knowledge
Keep in mind that diversified varieties, cultivars, and breeds of the same food have different nutritional content.4
Since the beginning of agriculture (ca. 12000 years
ago), we have faced a dramatic loss of plant and animal species used by humans as
food. For example in Thailand, from the 16,000 varieties of rice traditionally
cultured, today, only 37 are being cultivated.4
Not all of us should be eating the same things. Local traditions need to be
preserved for our health and for the health of our planet!
Recently, a scientific study has quantified the mass of life on earth (biomass) and has shown that within the animal kingdom (0.4% of the entire biomass), there are many more humans than wild animals and that there is around 40% more livestock than humans.5 This is crazy!
Accrording to FAO, countries, communities and cultures maintaining their traditional food systems not only conserve their local food specialties with the corresponding diversity of crops and animal breeds but are also less likely to suffer diet-related-diseases.4
A great scientific work safeguarding agricultural and
tree diversity to achieve a sustainable global food and nutrition security is
being performed by Biodiversity
International. One recent publication has shown that a great
diversity of cultivated vegetable species (1097) still exist around the world –
some of which could have the potential for a widespread diffusion, and many others
could fulfil important roles in nutrition at the local context.6
Also, a nice photographic social study performed by Peter Menzel and Faith D’Aluisio is presented in several books that
can be viewed online. They show photos and information about food habits and traditions of
people around the world. Really worth looking!
Why are we losing traditional food heritage?
industrial development, population increase and urbanization have changed
patterns of food production and consumption affecting deeply ecosystems and
For different reasons, the global market requires high
yields of some foods to be commercialized around the globe at a low price. This
need has pushed agriculture towards intensive farming and the cultivation of big
areas of monocultures and livestock. The abundance of these “cheap” global foods
(cheaper than locally produced foods) has simplified diets and damaged the
ecosystem (intensive-use fertilizers, pesticides, antibiotics, deforestation,
etc.). We will talk more about this topic, so stay tuned!
Also, to understand
our current food system better, have a look at the YouTube video created by Denis van Waerebeke (available in English with subtitles in many languages) which explains
the global players, dynamics, problems and inequalities affecting food
production and what can we do to be part of the solution. Worth watching!
The simplification of diets, the decline in
consumption of local nutritional food and the little time/interest we invest in
our food (cultivation, selection, preparation) are related to the increase incidence
of chronic diseases (nutritionally-poor and energy-rich).
Poor dietary habits and unhealthy diets are the cause of many nutrition
Interestingly, before all the scientific and
nutritional awareness about food (mostly on individual nutrients), culture
mediated the relationship between people and nature, and therefore, people’s
relationship with food as well. Industry, wanting to sell more, has undermined
the authority of traditional ways of nourishment, impacting how we eat and
causing serious harm to human health.
Food as a Public Health Problem
Today, 815 million people are undernourished7 while 1.9 billion are overweight, and from this 650
million obese.8 About half the global population is inadequately nourished (hunger,
micronutrient deficiencies and overweight/obesity).9
If we think
about it, these pandemic nutrition problems are a direct consequence of food waste
(link to post 3). Not only does our current food system waste 1.3 billion
tonnes per year10, but we waste food when we eat more that we need.
To waste food means not consuming it and overconsumption!
But let’s think about for a minute, our current food
system seems to be designed to waste, we need to change this! We need to
produce respecting our planet (including technological advancements) and the
people working to preserve it (e.g. agroecological farmers, sustainable
fishers). It sounds reasonable, don’t you think?
Changes might not be done in the twinkling of an eye, but if we start at home (paying attention to what we buy, from who we buy, at what price, buying seasonally, locally and only what we are going to eat and support the work of farmers producing taking care of the ecosystem (at home or abroad) and politicians willing to take actions in their favor) and talk about it, soon we will be more until we become the majority. Then, the industry that wants to sell will sell what we want.
Things can change if we really want them to change. We,
as individuals, can make the difference, we are already doing it!
But to change, we need to get informed and understand how things work and
what is good for our health which is not disconnected from what is good for our
society and our planet.
A healthy diet is a diet that must satisfy energy
needs (proteins, fats, carbohydrates) and essential nutrients (vitamins and
minerals) through food, to attain and maintain optimal health and physiological
Importantly, our bodies need energy (energy
requirement) for a series of functions that are essential for life or basal
metabolism (e.g. heart beating, respiration, brain activity, cell function and
replacement; synthesis, secretion and metabolism of enzymes and hormones, or
everything that our smart bodies do on their own), to process food and to perform
physical activity. Additionally, at some stages of our lives we need more energy, to
allow growth and development during childhood, deposition of tissue during
pregnancy and the secretion of milk during lactation.11
So, every day and depending on our body needs (age,
gender, body size, body composition, metabolism and physical activity), we need
to achieve an energy balance. This happens when the dietary energy intake (what
we eat) is equal to the total energy expenditure (what the body consumes).11
Malnutrition occurs when, at long term, the energy balance is not
reached (either too much or too little)
and/or there is a deficiency of nutrients.
Sources of energy
Fats and carbohydrates are the main sources of dietary
energy, though proteins also provide important amounts of energy, especially
when total dietary energy intake is limited.11
Current energy recommendations for a healthy diet
suggest a distribution of proteins, fats, and carbohydrates are in the range of
15, 29 and 55 percent daily (conversion factor of 4, 9 and 4 kilocalories per
gram (kcal/g) for proteins, fats and carbohydrates).12 Meaning that, if an adult consumes 2000 kcal/day as commonly recommended, the
energy intake should be divided in 300 kcal coming from proteins, 580 kcal from
fats and 1100 kcal from carbohydrates (or 75 g, 64 g and 275 g) daily.
Additionally, dietary fiber (ca. 2% daily requirement)12 is very important for a healthy diet as it interacts with the gut’s microbiome
maintaining or improving the microbiota. In recent years, the awareness about
the importance of human microbiota (microorganism within our body) has increased.
We will talk more about this topic. Stay tuned!
We need quality and diverse food that provides energy, vitamins and
minerals needed to live in a healthy way!
It’s worth noting that the values recommended for
daily energy requirements are used as a matter of convention and convenience as
they represent an average of energy needs over certain period of time and that
there is a large inter-individual variation.11 So, if we considering
the average energy value for everybody (e.g. 2000 kcal), some people could be
eating either too much or too little.
It is possible to calculate individual energy
requirements12, soon we will perform an exercise to share it with
you, don’t miss it!
The Best Diet
There is misunderstanding about the exact components
of a healthy diet, and many diets considered to be healthy.
The confusion is probably because the scientific
information available is misleading. Many studies have been based only on
individual nutrient (e.g. fats, carbohydrates), others have been sponsored by
companies which comprises the accuracy of the conclusions, and a lot of
knowledge has been spread without really understanding the long-term benefits.
To clarify these misunderstandings, it would help if
scientific studies would focus on nutrients in the context of food, food in the
context of diet and diet in the context of lifestyle.
Common sense about diet is not common yet!
Luckily, it seems like most recognized diets have a
lot in common. This is the outcome of the True Health Initiative, a global community with more than 400 world-renowned health experts. The
initiative evaluates scientific information and spread fundamental evidence and
consensus-based truths about lifestyle as medicine.
What do most recognized diets recommend?
(true food). Not too much. Mostly plants”…
And drink mostly water with it!13
In essence, most diets recommend meals rich in
vegetables, fruits, beans, lentils, nuts, whole grains, seeds with or without
other elements such as dairy, eggs, meat (consumed in small portions), and
prevailing quality over quantity.
Seems easy, right? But, what is true food?
True food refers to food that grows in nature (fruits,
vegetable, grains, seeds, nuts, etc.), minimally
processed (traditionally or innovatively transformed/conserved (e.g. bread,
cheese, yogurt or under vacuum); the less additives the better and even better
if they are all natural), sustainable
(produced on healthy soil using clean water, respecting the environment and
conserving biodiversity), and ethically
produced (towards humans and animals).
The production of true food treats the environment, plants, animals and
people with respect avoiding intensification (that requires the use of
chemical fertilizers, pesticides and antibiotics) and exploitation.
However, this is not the way most food is produced. The cost of this food is cheap for the
consumer but comes at a very high price for the farmers and the environment. It destroys our society, our planet and our
health because at the end, it is all connected!
If we care about consuming true food, we support not
only a healthy way of eating but we also build a community that shares values
of respect towards nature and humans beings.
In post 2 we talked about food as a good and the environmental connotation of its production. But, food is much more, once it is prepared and placed in the table, it connects us, brings emotion and joy to our life and at the same time it nourishes us!
Food is meant to be enjoyed! Pleasure is good for our health.
If we think about it, people having fun tend to be healthier.
Lifestyle as Medicine
Nowadays, there is a general consensus that health
needs to be approach in a holistic way – meaning that food is very important
for health but not less important than physical activity, sleep, happiness, low
levels of stress and good social interactions. Lifestyle as medicine is not
only important for disease prevention but also improves the outcome of many
On this regard and remarking on the importance of
healthy diets have a look to the YouTube video What is the best diet? with Dr. Mike Evans from the Reframe Health Lab. Many nice
videos on his website that are really worth watching!
Many factors influence our health – and a very
important one is what we eat.
It is important to eat in a sustainable manner,
prevailing quality over quantity, thinking of our health and our planet, respecting
all living beings, and safeguarding local food traditions and biodiversity!!
Let’s remember that changes in the food system can
come either from above (e.g. politics-related work, activism) or from below (e.g.
food demand, health literacy, label reading ability).
The industry produces what the consumer wants! So, we,
the consumers, are able to change things if we really want!
We can start caring about what we eat in an active way. Let’s prepare our own food.Let’s start cooking!!
In post 2, we saw that to produce food we need energy, soil, water and biodiversity. So now, let’s talk about soil!
Soil is a very complex
It contains all naturally occurring chemical elements and simultaneously
combines solid, liquid and gaseous states. Soil
is also one of the most biodiverse habitats on earth.1
But, what is soil made of?
Around the world, soils are
very diverse. They
differentiate according to their physical, chemical and biological properties.1
There is a whole science behind soil and it is super interesting, especially if
you are thinking about making your own garden.
Here some basics:
Soil is made of mineral particles (originated
from the degradation of rocks), organic particles (originated from the
degradation of organic matter (plants and animals)) and biota (living
Soil particles leave tiny spaces between them
(pores) that can be filled with air and/or water. The amount of water (and as a
consequence the quantity of air) retained by the soil (infiltration) is
important for plant growth.2
Living organisms moving in the soil help to
aerate the soil favoring plant growing conditions.2 Soil is the home
of an enormous biodiversity (plants, macrofauna (e.g. ants, termites,
earthworms), mesofauna (mites, collembola), microfauna (protozoa, nematodes)
and microflora (bacteria, fungi), from which little is known (with the
exception of plants where ca. 90% species are known).3
Soil biodiversity plays a critical role in
sustaining long term soil health and providing soil-based ecosystem services
The soil and agriculture
Physical and chemical properties of the soil
(see figure above) together with factors influencing soil formation (CLORPT:
climate, organisms, relief, parent material and time) are largely responsible
for soil fertility and consequently agricultural productivity.3
To improve soil fertility,
external agricultural inputs, such as fertilizers and pesticides, are used. However, crop yields declined after several years
of intense soil use, despite the continuous use and increasing application of
these agricultural inputs.3
The strategy of improving
soil fertility by adding exhausted minerals and controlling pests is obviously
not the best solution!
It became necessary to
think about the quality of the soil.
Soil quality considers the importance of the
soil as a living system, with a wider role including not only biological
productivity but also environmental quality (impacts on air and water) and the
effects on plant and animal health.3
In recent years, the discussion of sustainable
development has increased and the paradigms of “soil health” and “soil
security” have emerged.3
According to FAO, a healthy soil has the continuous
capacity to function as a vital living system, within ecosystem and land-use
boundaries, to sustain biological productivity and to promote the quality of
air and water environments, and maintain plant, animal, and human health.1
For a sustainable and resilient production
system, maintaining soil stock nutrients is essential. However, soil stocks are
linked to ecosystem functions via the soil biota (i.e. living organisms).
Living organisms adapt to environmental change through natural selection (while
the physical and chemical components do not) hence they play a central role in
sustainable productivity and the provision of other ecosystem services (see
It is difficult to think
that the conventional practice of adding missing nutrients (e.g. nitrogen,
phosphorus, potassium) can be applied to living organisms. There are so many living organisms in a healthy
soil and probably many of them are endemic of a specific ecosystem. It will be
very hard to achieve!
Ok, so what do we do?
It is more efficient to let
the ecosystem take care of life within the soil and we take care of conserving
A healthier soil
Soil security is a broader, multidimensional and
integrative concept. Soil security is concerned with global
environmental sustainability issues such as the maintenance and improvement of
the global soil resource to produce food, fiber and fresh water, contribute to
energy and climate sustainability and to maintain biodiversity and the overall
protection of the ecosystem.3
To clarify the interactions between agroecology and
a healthy soil, let’s use the example of agroforestry.
Agroforestry is an agricultural system in which
trees and shrubs grow around or among crops or pasturelands.
Studies performed mostly in Africa (in tropical
maize-based agroforestry systems) have shown that soil biota abundance (the
number of living organisms) is higher in cultivations with trees than in the
ones without them. Additionally, the biological activity (e.g. earthworm’s
activity) is increased near trees producing larger quantities of fast
decomposing biomass that is rich in nutrients (e.g. nitrogen).3
The benefits of agro-ecosystem synergies, such
as those generated by tree-crop-soil-livestock interaction, are the reduction
of external trade-offs (e.g. fertilizers, pesticides). Additional alternatives
to reduce trade-offs favoring ecological synergies include crop rotation,
intercropping and the pruning of trees to reduce competition for sunlight that
at the same time generate biomass for mulching (or the coverage of the soil
surface) helping to conserve soil, water, to improve fertility and to control
Living in symbiosis with
nature is challenging but possible! Small innovative farmers around the world
are already doing it!3
Now, it becomes clear that a healthy soil does
not only take care of food production, and is the home of an exuberant
biodiversity but also, it also provides ecosystem services. But, what exactly
Soil-based ecosystem services are processes
delivered by the soil (e.g. nutrient capture and cycling) that supply a service
to the ecosystem (e.g. food production).
There are two types of services: agricultural
and non-agricultural. The following text box explains them:
A healthy soil sustains life, protects the soil, cleans the air, conserves biodiversity and keeps, stores and supplies water. But not only this, as we also saw on the previous post, soil has the potential to sequester CO2 from the atmosphere and mitigate climate change by conserving the forest while producing our food through agroecology.
In post 4, we also talked about nitrous oxide (N2O), an important greenhouse gas (GHG), remember? Well, N2O production is connected to agriculture and soil as well! Let’s see how.
Nitrogen and the soil
Nitrogen (N) is critical
for plant growth.4 But even if there is a lot of N in the air, it cannot be directly taken
in by plants. It needs to be transformed by the biological processes (e.g.
bacterial) of mineralization, nitrification, immobilization and
denitrification.2 At the end of the cycle, N goes back into the
atmosphere.4 Importantly, there are certain bacteria capable of
fixing N directly from the atmosphere forming the N-containing organic
substance that plants can use.1 The following figure shows the
Importantly, only a certain amount of nitrogen can be stored in the soil. The surplus (caused by the addition of
nitrogen containing fertilizers), is
lost in the atmosphere, in runoff and leaked resulting in contamination of the
air, surface and groundwaters.4 This is how agriculture, due to
an excess quantity of nitrogen containing fertilizers, produces N2O,
a powerful GHG!
This is ecologically and economically
if we understand the needs and the dynamics of a healthy soil, we can make
these processes more efficient, avoid soil degradation (i.e. removal of
nutrients and erosion) and reduce GHG emissions.
The challenge of climate
change, soil security and food security, requires a more productive and
resilient agriculturewith a better management of natural
resources. It requires
The international initiative 4 per 1000 aims to demonstrate that agriculture and specifically agricultural soils play a crucial role in achieving food security and reversing climate change (see post 4). Really worth checking it out!
Agroecology, “the ecology of the food system”, is a science, a global movement for
food security and sovereignty and also an agricultural practice. It is an
evolving concept that can also be referred as permaculture, organic agriculture, eco-agriculture, conservation
agriculture and minimum or no-tillage. Its main goal is to transform the food systems towards sustainability,
supporting the balance between ecological soundness, economic viability and
But, what is wrong with the conventional
agriculture besides its unsustainable relationship to a healthy soil from which
we just talked about?
Well, conventional agriculture over-emphasizes
high yields (monoculture production) and short-term profit, that results in
remarkable economic profits for some, at the cost of ecological degradation
(e.g. soil erosion, loss of agrodiversity, pest outbreak) and social side
effects (e.g. poverty, malnutrition, dependency, loss of livelihood diversity).3
Fortunately, these problems can be tackled with
agroecology. Agroecology is a holistic
strategy to produce food approaching ecological, economic and social
Even though there are some general guidelines
associated with target systems, regions and major soil groups, agroecology
requires fine tunings to meet farmers’ needs and adapt to climate, edaphic
(soil) and biological parameters of a specific local context.3
soil is central to agriculture and therefore sustainable agriculture is
essentially dependent on soil health.3
is not a natural process. Humans domesticate nature and disturb the natural
soil processes to produce food. How can it be sustainable?
Well, the key to use the ecosystem in favor of
agriculture and that agriculture respects and protects the ecosystem. The
following examples show four important aspects of agroecology and the
The cases above are just a few examples of the
outreach of agroecology and demonstrate that it is possible to feed the world population with food that is good,
healthy and fair.
This can be done with smart innovative practices
coming from small farmers that have adapted farming to the ecosystem.
Let’s support farmers
practicing sustainable agriculture!!
In this regard, there is a very nice
that advocates for agroecological innovations coming from farmers. It is really
worth checking it out!
Are you still not convinced as why it is so important
to support farmers?
Please have a look to the following figure that
shows the world urbanization patterns of the population:
It is evident that more and more people move
from the countryside to the cities. Nothing wrong with that, right? But if the
main reason is to escape from poverty and to have a “better life,” then,
something is really wrong with our society…
Did you know that of the ca. 770 million people
living in extreme poverty (or 11% of the words population living with less than
1.90 US dollar a day) 80% live in rural areas and are mostly farmers (two
Food is mandatory for
living! Which make it incomprehensive that the people producing this essential good
are among the poorest! And no wonder only few young people are interested in
How can farmers be motivated to produce good
quality food if we do not pay a fair price?
Importantly, prices not only include the cost of
food production, but also a range of other factors not captured in the price of
conventional food (e.g. environmental enhancement protection, higher standards
for animal wellbeing, avoidance of health risks to farmers, rural development).
We need to support farmers,
especially agroecologial producers, so that they keep feeding the world with
good, delicious, healthy, fair food – with true food!
But, who are these farmers?
Worldwide, there are more than 570 million
farms, from which more than 475 million farms are smaller than 2 hectares (ca.
84% operating in 12% of the worlds agricultural land), and more than 500
million are family farms (about 90% operating in ca. 75% of the farm land). Family
farms are constantly distributed in almost all countries in the world and,
therefore, are likely to be responsible for most of the world’s food and
Also, in low income countries, small farms
operate more farmland that do small farms in higher income countries.6
So, we know now more about who is producing our
food but how do we support them?
Probably, the only way of really doing it, is to
find out who is our farmer. Shops are in the obligation of informing us and, if
they cannot do so or we do not trust the information obtained, it may be a good
time to change provider.
But, you might think that the so-called
biological shops selling organic food are just too expensive and products are
unaffordable…and you are probably right. A new economic system is now using the
word organic frequently and labels food with lots of certificates.
And yes, we agree that organic products are
limited, typically they have greater production and logistics costs due to the
smaller quantities of produce (e.g. transportation, marketing, distribution)
and farmers need to pay to be “certified organic”.7
When did it become normal that the food needed
to be certified to be organic? Isn’t food organic by definition? Shouldn’t the
food that uses chemical inputs be labeled chemically produce? Our food system
is upside down!
Actually, there are a lot of agricultural
systems that fully meet the requirements for organic agriculture that are not-certified organic. Especially in
developing countries, these products are sold locally (e.g. village markets)
directly to the consumer who benefit from knowing the origin of the food at
normal market price.7Let’s
support their work!
But what does the “organic label”
mean? Foods labeled as organic certify that the product does not contain
synthetic fertilizers, pesticides, hormones and antibiotics, right? However, should we not care about what is inside our
food and where it comes from instead? It might be the only way to start
living in a sustainable way!
To achieve a transformation in the food system, changes
are needed. From the production to the table. From those who grow food, to
those who eat it, and all those who move the food in between.3
Some really outstanding projects that are making
the difference by using agroecological principles are:
Nagenahiru, in Siri Lanka, is a foundation that focuses on
the capacity of building disadvantaged rural communities addressing local needs
through economically viable, culturally feasible, socially just and
ecologically sustainable activities. They are achieving amazing things!
Eca-Amarakaeri, in Peru, is a Communal and Natural Reserve
co-managed by 10 indigenous communities and representatives of the Peruvian State,
covering an area of more than 400,000 hectares of forest. The financing comes
from the sustainable harvesting of Brazilian nut which generates a stable
income avoiding illegal logging, mining and other activities that threaten the
la Palma, in
southern Spain, is a farm within the National Park de Doñana that has managed
an integrated intervention of artificial wetland habitat for fish farming (29%
of the land), the ecoagricultural practices of rice cultivation and foraging
crops for cattle and horses growing (29% of the land) with the preservation of
the ecosystem (42% of the land), generating
new economic activities based on principals of sustainability.
in one of the last islands of the Veracruz Cloud Forest in Mexico, is a
sustainable agroecologiacal farm as well as a green enterprise sharing
knowledge through courses, seeds, plants and books helping others to implement
practical and integrated solutions to live in a more sustainable way.
But probably one of the best ways to start is
simple and can be started at home, in our community: let’s start a sustainable garden! There are a lot of benefits in
creating gardens in cities (urban gardening):8
Economically, it helps low-income households to grow food for consumption and the surpluses for selling (income generation). Additionally, it provides employment opportunities.
Socially, it can provide a sense of community, promote rural-urban connections. It offers recreational opportunities improving life quality for urban residents (particularly young and elderly people). The production and consumption of fresh and nutritious vegetables improves child nutrition.
Ecologically, it reuses wastewater and organic soil waste, reduces the use of fertilizers and pesticides, and helps cites to become more resilient to climate change by reducing vulnerability of urban residents (particularly poor), diversifying urban food sources and income opportunities, keeping green open spaces and enhancing vegetative cover reducing urban heat-island effect.
Cities have a vital role to play in shaping the food system of the future, they can offer valuable contributions for regenerative practices with the potential of creating a new sustainable economy.9
Let’s be an active part of the solution; buy local, sustainable, seasonal, Fairtrade items, support agroecological farmers and make your own garden.
Stay tuned – we are starting our own urban garden! You can be part of it here by sharing your thoughts, ideas and suggestions.
By M. S. Gachetet N. Zanuto Full story of the cover photo can be found here.
As you saw on the previous posts (put link to post2 and 3), all agricultural activities need air, water, soil and biodiversity, and therefore have an impact on the planet. This impact can be positive if agriculture respects the ecosystem or negative if natural resources are exploited excessively. Agriculture, climate change and food security are interconnected.1Let’s see how!
The Earth’s climate changes constantly
due to small variations in the planet’s orbit. However, since the end of the
19th century the surface temperature has increased by 0.85 °C (0.65 to 1.06 °C)
and the sea level has risen, as shown in the figures below (figure taken from
the IPCC 2014 report):2
activity and the impact on climate change
This increase is driven in large part by human activities. Humans have
altered the delicate balance of the planet by polluting air, water, soil and
destroying biodiversity. The figure below (figure taken from the IPCC 2014
report)2 helps us to understand the human impact (anthropogenic) on
the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases (GHG):
In fact, atmospheric concentrations of
carbon dioxide (CO2) have increased by more than 1/3 since the
beginning of the 19th century.2
As we mentioned in post 3: Carbon footprint of food = Greenhouse gases (GHG) expressed in Kg of CO2 that a product emits throughout its lifetime.
In fact, GHG capture the
heat radiated by the sun and heat the earth.3
Just to mention, water vapor (H2O) is an abundant GHG as well.3
However, due to its impact on the climate (through the formation of clouds and
precipitation), and its low human impact, we are not going into details about
The following figure shows
the sources and concentration of GHG in the atmosphere.
Believe me, this is really
warming is happening due to an increased emission of GHG, especially caused by
human activity (fossil fuels, industrial processes, increased use of natural
resources, intensive agriculture, livestock farming and deforestation).
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations) estimates that between the years of 2003 and 2013,
natural disasters triggered by natural hazards caused economiclosses valued in
1.5 trillion US dollars. In developing countries, during the same time
period, these disasters cost about 550 billion US dollars, affecting 2 billion
people. About 22% of these damages
belong to agriculture and its subsectors (crops, livestock, fisheries and
change and the agriculture
Climate change not only causes
economic losses, but also has direct and indirect effects on agricultural
productivity, such as variations in rainfall regimes, droughts, floods, geographic
redistribution of biodiversity (including pests)5 and diseases.1
The large amounts of CO2 absorbed by the oceans also cause
acidification which results in deteriorating marine ecosystems.6
One of the
biggest consequences of climate change are the natural disasters that are
responsible for agricultural losses which have alarming effects on food
So what happens to the earth?
the Earth, is overweight (403 ppm CO2 eq. (average value of year
2016)) and increasing.7 Depending on the actions
we take, scientists predict that the temperature will rise up to 4 °C by the
year 2100 (450 ppm CO2 eq. will increase the planet’s temperature 2
°C and 1000 ppm CO2 eq. 4 °C).2This means not only an increase in the number of natural disasters
but, as the planet gets hotter, it will be very difficult to produce food in
the tropics, which will cause biodiversity to migrate (including people) to
more peripheral regions in the planet, and as a consequence will result in a
tremendous impact on human well-being.5
It is evident that the impact of
climate change on food and agriculture is interconnected with environmental,
social and economic fields (i.e. food security, nutrition, health, and human
This is a very serious problem! So,
what can we do, and how does it relate to food? To answer these questions,
let’s have a close look at the human contribution (our contribution) to the GHG
The following figure shows the
anthropogenic sources of GHG:
We can see that “Energy Production” is
by far the biggest source of GHG, but let’s have a look at the second one,
“Agricultural Processes” which accounts for 21% of the GHG emitted.1
The following figure shows the share
of agricultural emissions in CO2 eq. in year 2014 by source and at a
The main cause of agricultural GHG
emissions is by far enteric fermentation
(the digestion processes of ruminants such as cattle, sheep, goats, buffalo,
deer, giraffes and camels).
Enteric fermentation is the main
source in Latin America and the Caribbean with 58% (followed by manure left on
pasture with 23% and synthetic fertilizers with 6%), in Southern Asia with 46%,
in Sub-Saharan Africa with 40%, in Northern Africa and Western Asia with 39%
and in developed countries with 37%. Only in Oceania (excluding Australia and
New Zealand) and in Eastern and Southeastern Asia is the main source of
agricultural GHG derived from the cultivation of organic soils with 59%
(followed by enteric fermentation with 14% and manure management with 14%) and
rice cultivation with 26% (followed by enteric fermentation with 24% and synthetic
fertilizer with 17%), respectively.1
But let’s not mistake the problem. Because cows alone are not. They
actually contribute to soil fertility inside an healthy ecosystem. The problem
is the number cows being raised to meet human demand.
A recent scientific study has quantified the mass of life on earth
(biomass) and has shown that within the animal kingdom (2% of the entire
biomass), there are more than 10x more humans than wild animals and that there are
about 40% more livestock than humans.8 This is crazy!
producing meat and to satisfy the world’s food and energy demand of the growing
population, the most important forests and savannas will need to be destroyed!1And if
deforestation takes place, what will happen? What is already happening?
Climate Change and the Carbon Cycle
To understand the important role of forests in the weather, we need to talk about the carbon cycle. But let’s start by linking some concepts. Remember CO2 and CH4, our very important GHG, both contain one atom of carbon (C).
However, C is not only found in the atmosphere. Actually, there are five global C pools (as shown in the following figure too):9
the oceanic pool;
the geological pool
(which includes the fossil fuels);
the soil pool
(comprising the soil organic C and the soil inorganic C);
the atmospheric pool
the biotic pool
(comprising live biomass and detritus material)
There is a strong interaction between the terrestrial and atmospheric C pools through photosynthesis, respiration and soil metabolism. The potential of a healthy soil becomes evident in sequestering atmospheric CO2 in both the biotic and pedologic C pools (620 and 2500 Pg, respectively). Additionally, deforestation impoverishes the soil releasing ca. 1.6 Pg C/Year.9
forests are very important, not only because they produce oxygen, but
especially because of their capacity to keep a healthy soil which allows the
capture of atmospheric CO2.
But we need food, right? Luckily, we can also have a healthy soil
through ecofriendly agriculture. Many scientists, farmers and international
organizations believe that the understanding of the soil’s role in climate
stability and agricultural productivity will trigger the abandonment of
conventional practices (i.e. tillage, crop residue removal, mono-cropping,
excessive grazing and excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides) and
adoption of organic agriculture.
The Potential of Carbon Sequestration
through Organic Agriculture
According to FAO: “Organic Agriculture is a holistic production management system which promotes and enhances agro-ecosystem health, including biodiversity, biological cycles, and soil biological activity.”10
Also referred as Agroecology, it is based on applying ecological concepts and principles to optimize interactions between plants, animals, humans and the environment while taking into consideration the social aspects that need to be addressed for a sustainable and fair food system.11
sustainable form of agriculture takes care of the whole ecosystem! Isn’t it
Some sustainable agricultural practices (management practices) that contribute to CO2 sequestration are:9
of mechanical tillage;
of cover crops into the rotation cycle;
soil fertility through biological means (i.e. compost, animal manures and
nitrogen fixation plants that also contribute to mitigate N2O);
of conservation-effective measures to minimize soil and water losses (e.g. soil
water storage, drip irrigation);
better use of the complex farming systems including complex rotations, mixed
farming (i.e. crop-livestock) and agroforestry techniques that efficiently use
resources, enhance biodiversity and mimic natural ecosystems.
So much information… What can we do
Climate change is a big problem which concerns all of us. Choose walking, riding a bike or public transportation instead of driving; heat and cool only the necessary; reevaluate, reconceptualize, restructure, redistribute, relocate, reduce, reuse and recycle.
Regarding food, let’s start by making
connections. Food is directly linked
with the farmers, the land, the watersheds and the climate. And our health is a
reflection of the quality and quantity of the food we consume. At the end,
it is all interconnected!
If we reduce
waste, change our diet to eat less meat and dairy, support agroecology, local
markets and sustainable intensification to increase yields on underperforming
crops, and protect the forest, we may be able stop global warming and feed more
than nine billion people a healthy diet.
the forest, promote and support Organic Agriculture and local markets!
Some great initiatives out there are
making a huge difference to help spread good agricultural practices.
Organizations like A Growing Culture are promoting and facilitating
collective learning between farmers, empowering smaller farmers, supporting
agroecological innovations and a sustainable food system.
Another great one is the Godan
that shares agricultural and nutritional data globally encouraging
collaboration and cooperation that will bring together stakeholders to solve
long-standing global problems.
The Equator Initiative on the other hand, recognizes
outstanding local sustainable development solutions supporting the formation of
resilient communities. The projects being awarded are doing amazing things, it
is really worth getting to know them!
An interesting website with more
information about food and climate change is the Food Climate Research Network who is raising awareness and
connecting stakeholders with the common interest of understanding and building
sustainable food systems.
In Drawdown and ZERI, you can find sustainable practices that are already being implemented and; the Ellen Macarthur Report circular solutions that can change the food system within cities. Worth knowing them!
Importantly, children are also
actively involved. Fridays for
future, the movement started by Greta
Thunberg, a Swedish high school student who in August 2018, started school
strikes on Fridays asking her government (and later the world), to take
political actions to reduce emissions caused by climate change in accordance
with the Paris
Agreement. The movement has expand and is now present in 101 countries
around the world.
USA, is a lawsuit filed in 2015 by 21 young plaintiffs asserting that the
federal government violated their constitutional rights to life, liberty and prosperity
(only possible inside a clean environment) by causing dangerous carbon dioxide
concentrations. Let’s stay tuned and see how this demand develops.
Another very interesting case is the
lawsuit known as “The Huaraz Case”.
In 2015, Saúl Luciano Lliuya, a mountain guide living in Huaraz, Peru, filed a
lawsuit against the German energy company RWE
to be responsible for its carbon emissions. The global increase in carbon in
the atmosphere is causing the melting of the Peruvian glacial risking to destroy
the home of his community. He asks for the construction of a dam to protect his
home for the future effects of climate change.
A proposal worth mentioning is the Yasuní-ITT Initiative in which the government of Ecuador proposed to the world in 2010, to maintain the oil reserves that are located below one of the regions with the greatest biodiversity in the world, Yasuni National Park in the Ecuadorian Amazon, in exchange for the potential oil revenues (3.6 billion US dollars). The objective of the initiative was to conserve biodiversity, protect indigenous peoples living in voluntary isolation and avoid CO2 emissions. Unfortunately, fundraising was insufficient and oil has been extracted since 2016.
Ecuador has also been a pioneer in the protection of nature at the political level, being the first country in the world where “Nature is a subject of law”, meaning that the Ecuadorian Constitution (or Montecristi Constitution) recognizes since 2008 the right to life of species beyond utility or affectation for humans. It protects life reproduction, both in the ecological and evolutionary sense claiming the right to integral restoration. It also recognizes that the rights of people and nature complement and enhance each other, and that in nature there are no geographical barriers. The constitutions, however, does not oblige to have an untouched nature or animal welfare, allowing large-scale mining even in fragile areas among other economic activities that destroy nature. Undoubtedly, a lot of work still needs to be done…
Recently, an important philosophical
claim to respect nature has also come from the Vatican with the encyclical
Laudato si’ written by Pope Francis. The document emphasizes the fact that
the human being is not the owner of nature, but only a part of it, which
depends on it to exist and exalts the human duty to preserve it. It is worth
Supporting existing and outstanding initiatives that are working to solve the problem is of course important. However, each one of us can be part of the solution by properly choosing our food, what and where we are buying, from whom we are buying and at what price. These little gestures can really start changing the world!
the greatest feats of our time is to guarantee the food security on the planet.
According to FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations):
“Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical,
social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food which meets
their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.1“
The growing population
Human population continues to grow, especially in developing countries, and in 2050 9 billion people will populate the earth. How to feed 9 billion people is generating commotion not only regarding the need of producing more and “better” but also when addressing awareness about food waste and unequal food distribution.2
figure below shows how the population increased during the past 65 years and
the projections for 2050.3
can see in the figure, in proportion, the European population seems to decrease
(but in truth it remains steady from 2000 to 2050) while the population in
Africa is increasing more than 10x when comparing 1950 to 2050.
rest of the continents do not show drastic variations in proportion. However,
the population in Latin America and Oceania will increase more than 4x, Asia
almost 4x and North America more than 2x (global increase almost 4x) by 2050.3
China and India have grown from 554 and 376 million in 1950 to 1.4 and 1.3
billion in 2015, respectively.3
huge numbers! So, how are we going to feed all those people? And what does it
following videos (available in English with
subtitles in many languages) by Denis van Waerebeke and the organization Feeding9billion
clearly show the difficulties of feeding the growing population and how we can
be part of the solution. Really worth watching!
But how do people eat?
Human diet is as diverse as are people and cultures around the world. There is no “ideal diet”, but there are ideal diets depending on the geographical location and the conditions of each region that provide the energy required to enjoy a healthy life.
There is an overall knowledge that a regular person should consume 2000 dietary calories or kilocalories per day (energy requirement). However, we did not find scientific proof explaining the calculation. If you find any, please let us know on the comments.
accurate value for daily energy requirements should consider gender, age, body
size, body composition and lifestyle and therefore, cannot be standardized to
accommodate every person`s needs.4
Food provides us the right mixture of nutrients (i.e. carbohydrates, fats, proteins, vitamins and minerals). Most foods are a mixture of nutrients; cereals for example are an important source of energy (carbohydrates and fats) but are also a source of vitamins and minerals.5
Gregg Segal shows nicely in his project Daily Bread, what kids around the
world are eating allowing us to see not only how diverse food culture around
the world is, but also the health value of home cooked meals in contrast to
junk/processed food. Great pictures indeed!
It is very important to maintain cultural diversity (and diversity in general)! Imagine if we all eat the same things. It would be disturbing and also unsustainable! On this regard, the organization Slow Food, promotes the preservation of culinary traditions and the farming of local plants, seeds and animals. They are a global movement which acts locally. This is a great one to support!
How does human diet influence food security?
National Geographic6, using FAO information7, shows in simple illustrative graphics the consumption patterns of 22 countries around the world and how these have changed over a span of 50 years. On a global scale, between 1961 and 2011, the consumption of produce (roots with high starch content, vegetable and fruits), meat products and sugars/fats have increased. The figure below shows the world`s average daily consumption in both calories (cal) and grams (g).6
evident that a small portion of grain (e.g. 351 g) generates a lot of energy
(1085 cal) and that a large amount of produce (488 g) generates little energy
(270 cal).6 Please keep in mind that energy, in this case referred to
as calories, does not mean “weight gain”. Energy is vital! You should be more
concerned about the quality of the
calories and to have a balanced diet
rather than worrying about the number of calories itself. In the figure, we
show the relation between calories and grams consumed daily per person6
in order to associate them later on with the food itself.
so you know: energy is measured in units of kilocalories (kcal) or kilojoules
(kJ). A kilocalorie (1 kcal) equals 4.18 kilojoules (4.18 kJ). The numbers
shown here in calories (cal) actually refer to kilocalories (kcal).
figure bellow presents a better view of the impact of food consumption in
China, India, USA, Brazil, Japan and Somalia in years 1961 and 2011.6
China not only increased almost 4x the amount of food consumption between 1961
and 2011, but also increased more than 10x the amount of meat consumption.6
If we think about this and the increase in population, we can imagine the
impact on food security (China is just one example).
evident that the complexity of food security increases with increasing
prosperity in the world. China and India, which are driving an increased demand
for food, especially meat, eggs and dairy products,6 subsequently
increasing the pressure to produce more maize and soybeans to feed cattle, pigs
change in habits (specially the increased demand for animal derived products)
is also evident in emerging economies all around the world. If we think about
it, Brazil, for example, has more than tripled (3x) this meat production in 50
years. Other examples can be found in the National Geographic study.6
these trends continue, the impact of population growth and diets with a greater
animal component will require doubling
agricultural production by 2050.
also alarming to think about the excessive and indiscriminate exploitation of
the oceans to meet the needs of emerging economies. China, for example, has recently
been involved in massive, non-selective and illegal fishing events in Senegal8, Ecuador9and other Pacific countries10.
recent study in West Africa shows that illegal fishing accounts for 65% of
reported catches which puts food security and the region’s economy at risk.11
But what exactly does this mean for the local people?
interesting approach to fight against intensive fishing is the European project
Forward. The project aims to raise awareness about
the social and environmental impact of fish consumption. It targets consumers
and their willingness to contribute in changing this situation by choosing to
buy sustainable fish.
way we consume food is endangering biodiversity and human health. A new
regenerative food system model it is required, a circular one.12
The problem of the food in the world is complex, it affects all the inhabitants of the earth. It does not require a single hero or a magic formula, it requires the work and creativity of each one of us. Together we can solve it and build a healthy and fair world with food for all.
If you want to be part of this movement, stay tuned! We are going to talk a lot about the food problems in the world, how we can be part of the solution and the initiatives that are contributing to a better world.
By M. S. Gachetet N. Zanuto Link to initiative here.
One third of the food produced for human consumption is lost or wasted
every year (FAOs estimation (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations)). This is approximately 1.3 billion tonnes, an average of 265
Kg/person/year and 750 billion US dollars per year (equivalent to the GDP of
With the food produced and not consumed
(wastage) today, we could eradicate hunger!3
How does this happen?
To understand how and why food is wasted and what we can do to help change this situation what, let’s first understand how our food is produced.
As mentioned in post 2, to produce food we need: essential elements that form all living organisms (carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and nitrogen), water, soil and biodiversity.
If we think about it, the food
production itself is consuming a lot of natural resources, right?
Food production not only requires
natural resources, but also energy for postharvest handling and storage,
processing and distribution up to consumption. Now imagine if we do not consume
this food, how big would the wastage be? How can this impact, this footprint,
The Environmental Footprint of Wastage
Just to make it clear, the famous “environmental food footprint” is the energy and resources required to produce food and is evaluated using four indicators: the carbon footprint, the blue water footprint, land occupation and the impact on biodiversity.1,2
Now, in the picture below, you can see some really impactful numbers
which demonstrate how large the food
footprint of wastage is. To highlight some of these numbers, imagine a
person riding in a car for 2.300 Km every year (almost the distance between New
York and Las Vegas). This is the approximate carbon footprint of one person; or
3x the volume of water of Lake Geneva. This is the water consumed to produce
food wastage in the world (the blue water footprint) per year; or in terms of
land use, we can attribute it an area that corresponds to the size between
Russia and Canada, approximately 28% of the total world area!1,2
The equivalent of 6 garbage trucks of edible
food is lost or wasted every second!4
Food with the Highest Environmental Impact on Food Wastage
To identify the impacts of food wastage on natural resources and where and why these impacts occur, FAO has grouped food in eight food commodities:
1. Cereals (excluding beer), 2. Starchy Roots, 3. Oilcrops and Pulses, 4. Fruits (excluding wine), 5. Meat, 6. Fish & Seafood, 7. Milk (excluding butter) & Eggs and 8. Vegetables.
The study shows that cereals and vegetables have the greatest
environmental impact for the carbon footprint, the blue water indicator and the
land occupation accounting for around 50% in all cases.1,2
Regions with the Highest Environmental Impact on Food Wastage
As already mentioned in post 2, farming (conversion of wild lands and intensification) is the major threat to biodiversity globally. It is important to note that this occurs mostly in developing regions (72% and 34% of species are threatened by crops and livestock production, respectively, versus 44% and 21% occurring in developed countries). Deforestation due to agricultural expansion occurs mainly in tropical and subtropical regions of Africa (62%), Latin America (25%) and Asia (13%)1,2 and has destroyed 5.2 million Ha/year between 2000 and 2010 (the net annual loss of forest equivalent to an area about the size of Costa Rica)5.
In financial terms, the food wastage with greater economic impact are
vegetables and meat accounting for around 170 and 160 billion US dollars per
year, respectively. 1,2
In order to compare the impact by region, FAO has also divided the world
into seven regions with similar food cultural behavior, economic and social
backgrounds, which are shown in the figure bellow1,2:
Remarkably, the regions of North America & Oceania, Industrialized
Asia and Europe have the highest per capita carbon footprint of food wastage
(903, 741 and 686 Kg of CO2 eq./person/year, respectively).1,2
The wastage of cereals in Asia (especially rice and wheat) emerges as a
significant environmental hotspot showing high impacts on the carbon footprint
(Industrialized Asia with 14% and South & Southeast Asia with 11%), blue
water footprint (13% and 24%) and arable land occupation (5% and 9%). Fruits
wastage emerges as a blue water hotspot in Asia (Industrialized Asia with 3% and
South & Southeast Asia 4%), Latin America (3%) and Europe (3%). While the
carbon footprint of vegetables emerges as a hotspot in Asia (Industrialized
Asia 10% and South & Southeast Asia (3%) and Europe (4%).1,2
As you can see, wastage of cereals and vegetables
have the most significant environmental impact resulting in the highest global
footprint of carbon, water and land occupation.
The Food Life Cycle
So, why do we let all of these important natural resources get lost? To answer this question, let’s have a look the following graphic that explains the life cycle of food and the sources of food wastage.
As you can see, food is lost along the entire food supply (agricultural
production + postharvest handling and storage = 54% and processing + distribution
+ consumption = 46%). The later the phase of the life cycle, the greater the
impact due to its unnecessary production and transformation.1,2
If we throw away an apple pie, its environmental footprint will be
higher than to waste the apples collected at the field, right?
How and Why Food is Being Lost
The food losses are mainly caused by inefficiencies in the food supply chains (such as poor infrastructure and logistics, absence of technology, insufficient skills, knowledge and management capacity and lack of access to markets) and natural disasters. 1,2
Within the food life cycle, food
losses refer to agricultural production (stage 1 of the food life cycle)
and postharvest handling and storage (stage 2 of the food life cycle). 1,2
Individuals alone hardly have the power to contribute to improve food losses, but together, we can have an impact!
On the other hand, food waste
is caused by spoilage of food (food kept beyond its expiry date or left to
spoil) and oversupply due to markets, or individual consumer shopping or eating
habits. The food waste is the food appropriate for human consumption that is
being discarded. Within the food life cycle, food waste refers to processing
(stage 3), distribution (stage 4) and consumption (stage 5).1,2Each one of us can do something to improve
English there is a word to define total food waste (food wastage) which refers
to food losses in the stages 1 and 2 and food waste in the stages 3, 4 and 5 of
the food life cycle.
Now, we should know that the food wastage is different depending on the
region. Developing countries suffer more food losses during agricultural
production. However, food losses during agricultural production (stage 1) and
postharvest handling and storage (stage 2) are similar in all regions in the
world accounting for approximately one third of the food wastage of each
region. Meanwhile, in mid- and high-income regions, the food wasted tends to be
greater at consumption level. In fact, food wasted during processing (stage 3),
distribution (stage 4) and consumption (stage 5) represents 31-39% in mid- and
high-income regions while in low-income regions accounts only 4-16%.1,2
Another important point to consider when talking about food wastage is the so-called “ugly food” mostly referring to fruits and vegetables, but also animal parts. Only for aesthetic reason, markets and people prefer consuming “beautiful and impeccable” produce and as a consequence, huge amounts of “perfect food” is being thrown away!
Food Wastage Volume per Region
Each region of the world has its own profile in terms of food wastage (quantities and type of product). In the figure below we can see some numbers:1,2
The world region with the biggest impact regarding wastage volumes is
Asia with the highest wastage of vegetables (Industrialized Asia with 11% and
South & Southeast Asia with 4%) and cereals (16% in total). Sub-Saharan
Africa, Industrialized Asia and Europe wastage volume is high regarding starchy
roots (5%, 4.5% and 4%, respectively) and South & Southeast Asia and Latin
America regarding fruits (4% and 3%, respectively).
Interestingly, Industrialized Asia food wastage is lower in percentage
than other high-income regions. The high wastage volume is because this region
dominates the world vegetables production and consumption, with more than 50%
Also keep in mind that in Asia today is where 60% of the population lives!
In Sub-Saharan Africa region, the high wastage of starchy roots at a global level is because of high volumes of losses in the agricultural and post-harvest phases (stages 1 and 2).1,2
In terms of food wastage per person, in the top 5, we find
Industrialized Asia for vegetables (~115 Kg/person/year), Sub-Saharan Africa
for starchy roots (~110 Kg/person/year) North Africa, Western Asia &
Central Asia for vegetables (~95 Kg/person/year), Latin America for fruits (~90
Kg/person/year) and Europe for starchy roots (~85 Kg/person/year).
Interestingly, when comparing with total food wastage volumes, South &
Southeast Asia region is no longer on the top of the list. In fact, it has the
lowest food wastage volumes per capita.1,2
These big numbers in South & Southeast Asia and Africa, also
represent the food that is being wasted due to the lack of proper storage
possibilities. To address this needs,Evaptainers andWakati are building innovative cooling systems. It’s worth checking them
As we can see, in each region of the world the problem of wastage
considers many factors and is different for each region!
Food wastage is a serious problem for which we are all responsible. Our consumer footprint has an impact. Our food is connected with the earth, the watersheds, the climate and the people who produce the food we eat. Only by becoming aware of our contribution will we have the right tools to make decisions that will allow us to build a sustainable world.
Around the world there are local movements using different strategies to fight food waste. Here there are several examples:
Food for Soul, born in Italy, is one we love. Their approach involves chefs and their knowledge to transform ordinary ingredients (surpluses of food that otherwise will be wasted) into extraordinary dishes that will be served to the poorest, fighting like this against food waste while promoting social inclusion. You will probably think that this kind of strategy would only work in developed countries however, one of these centers Gastromotiva, is running in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Stop Wasting Food is a
Danish movement, that started by raising consumer awareness and in 5 years it
has become the largest non-profit consumer movement against food waste in the
world. They teamed up with the country’s biggest low-cost supermarket chain to
replace all quantity discounts with single item discounts to minimize food
waste, promote the opening of food surplus supermarkets, outreach programs to
the homeless, and with a greater focus is involving the industry, retailers,
canteens, restaurants and foodservices in the fight against food waste. Many
practical tips to reduce food waste can be found on their website. It is really
worth checking them out!
France is taking action at a political level and has passed a law forbidding supermarkets’ food waste. Food needs
to be redistributed/donated before it goes bad, otherwise supermarkets will get
Costa Rica is also taking action at a political level with a well-structured
plan of action; have a look here.
Involving the community, the movement Re-food in Portugal, is collecting the surpluses from restaurants and with the
help of volunteers, taking them to people in need.
Involved supermarket Chowberry in
Nigeria has created a new sustainable food chain out of products approaching
end of shelf-life allowing consumers to see their availability and discounted
prices in real-time. This discounted food is obtained by charities and NGOs
helping tackle food poverty.
In most countries of Latin America, non-profit organizations known as Banco de Alimentos are collecting food
that, for various reasons, would be discarded. Just type on google: banco de alimentos + “country name” to
If we think about it, in Latin America and the Caribbean for example,
with the food that is being lost only in terms of retailing (supermarkets,
street markets, shops and small retail) more than 30 million people, that
represents 64% of people suffering from hunger in the region, could be fed.6
Let’s stop food waste!
We do have the power as consumers!
We can buy only what we can eat, store and eat our leftovers, think that more is not always better by preferring quality over quantity, share surplus food and at restaurants, order only what you can eat and if you can’t finish your meal, take the leftovers home.
We can also choose to buy that apple that does not have the nicest
color, that broccoli that has a weird shape, and by doing this you will be,
nice and slowly, pressuring the system to change this rule that tells what kind
of vegetables and fruits can be sold at the market, otherwise it goes to the
trash (wastage). Also keep in mind also that the fruit with the little holes
from the worms might be the most delicious. Nature recognizes food quality much
better than we do. And that the perfect shape pear might have been treated so
that it remains as perfect as you want it…
To help decrease the numbers from food wastage relating to
non-consumption, you can use all of the parts of the produce you buy, the
leaves of the carrots and the stem of the broccoli can help to make a rich
vegetable broth for example. By doing so, you can always eat everything you
buy! It is that simple.
And remember that “nature does not waste anything”. Let’s start thinking about waste as resources and build a new economy, a circular one. Take a look at Ellen Macarthur Report, Drawdown and ZERI and get inspired.
By M. S. Gachetet N. Zanuto Full story of the cover photo can be found here.